In this article, Salon reveals many of the choices made during the casting process. Specifically, it compares how male and female characters are described. Here is an example of a couple in the same script:
Jason Biggs and Taylor Schilling of Orange is the New Black |
Male: 30. 30 going on 21. He’s married to [female]. He’s a fun, hip guy, but at his core, he’s become a family man.
Female: 29 – 30 years old. She’s both beautiful and cool and just a few notches this side of New-Agey.
The male character is described through personality, while the female character's looks are described before any personality descriptors. This is just one example of a long standing pattern in the entertainment world.
Lets not kid ourselves, there has been an established standard of "average" looking TV males coupled with beautiful model-type TV females. For women, attractiveness is not just the first hurdle, it's often the only one.
Hollywood's Hidden Sexism: How Casting Notices Keep Beauty Standards Alive
"Can producers stop vetoing casting options based on fuckability? And can a physical character description be an afterthought, only included if it furthers the plot? From my perspective, as an actress but also as an audience member, I think it would be nice to see a complex female character physically, emotionally and mentally realized on-screen not by the hottest woman, but by the very real actress best suited to play her."
Hollywood needs to get the memo. Hotness isn't a character trait.
No comments:
Post a Comment